Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
View Profile
« January 2005 »
S M T W T F S
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
You are not logged in. Log in
against the world
Thursday, 27 January 2005
too many christians waiting on the hollywood ending
last june, jeffrey lucey, a us soldier recently returned from iraq, killed himself, hung himself in the cellar of his parents' house with a hose. "the dog tags of two iraqi prisoners that he said he was forced to shoot unarmed, lay on his bed." those dog tags, he'd brought home with him, had worn them after being ordered to shoot them. his therapist told his father "he never wore those as trophies. he wore them as a symbol of honor to those men."

now, does this get big news coverage? no. gotta go to democracy now to read the interview with his parents. ran a search, and apparently a chicago tribune article made brief mention of his suicide, but without much background

"at the close of 2003, u.s. commanders put the number of insurgents [in iraq] at 5,000. earlier this month, gen. mohammed abdullah shahwani, the director of the iraqi intelligence service, said there are 200,000 insurgents, including at least 40,000 hard-core fighters. the rest, he said, are part-time fighters and supporters who provide food, shelter, funds and intelligence."

200,000 insurgents

keep in mind, us troops in iraq this month, according to the brookings institution's iraq index is only 150,000. sure, iraqi security forces are being trained, but aren't they just the group caught in the middle? the key here is we're outnumbered and unwanted... and, still we torture and shoot unarmed iraqis, traumatizing some of our own in the process

we create vicious animals or tramua victims of our own men. what happens when the war actually ends, when the iraq vets start trying to slip back into american society? people kept saying last summer that we needed to stop bringing up vietnam, it's been thirty years, let's leave that subject alone. but, clearly, no one learned anything from any of it, so maybe we should bring it up more, not less. maybe if john kerry had stopped playing the part of the high class massachusetts liberal he is now and embraced the antiwar, atrocity-admitting liberal he was a few decades ago, he could have had some impact, even if he still lost the damn election

we all know war is hell. at least, we pretend we know that. we say we don't need to see the dead bodies, don't need to watch the destruction on a personal level to know that war is hell. but, if we don't watch all the horror of it, if we don't particpate more directly (that is, tracking the details, the deaths, the injuries, the violence, rather than just checking brief news reports on whether we've won yet) then how will we be prepared to deal with the demons that come home with our troops?

of course, how many of us believe we're living in the "end times" and these troops won't necessarily ever be coming home, and even if they do, christ will show up and make it all better, a kiss on each wound and all the pain is gone?

too many, i'd say

too many christians waiting on the hollywood ending

Posted by ca4/muaddib at 9:53 AM PST
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Wednesday, 26 January 2005
"what is this--miami beach?"
bush wants iraqi voters to defy terrorists and risk their lives to go vote for the guy we already picked to win the election

condi rice will be confirmed as secretary of state, no matter who cares

two boys (9 and 10) in florida were taken from school in handcuffs after drawing pictures of themselves killing one of their classmates. police said it constituted a "written threat to kill or harm another person."

republican senator wayne allard out of colorado expects the gop leaders to call for a vote on a gay marriage ban (that is, the big amendment to the constitution) in the next year or two

but, of course the big, horrifying news, is that lexington, north carolina intends to use a damn potbellied pig for groundhog day. what kind of piece of shit policy is that? and, who do these lexington folks think they are, anyway, trying to steal the thunder from punxsutawney phil, especially because of a "heritage of barbecue"?

that's right. i picked the groundhog controversy over all the rest as the big item of the day. forget about senators trying to tell people that love each other they can't marry--not like we can separate the religious (read: god-ordered) custom from the legal corporation of two people, lest we have to allow three people to get married if they like down the line, cause how dare consenting adults try to live together--or that one of bush's biggest cheerleaders is getting an even more prominent cabinet position, nevermind how badly she pulled off the last one. forget about boys being arrested for drawing (of course, there are still comic book artists on trial or in jail for creating pornography or ultra violent comics, not to mention that one ordered never to draw again). forget about the national deficit rising even as bush demands another $80 billion for war costs (as the death toll rises and the fixed election looms). and, don't even bother thinking about whether or not we might be starting a war in iran by summer or fall at the latest (by bombing the government so the citizens will take it upon themselves to revolt and welcome us with hugs and garlands of flowers, just like their iraqi neighbors did). and, don't bother thinking about deforestation or overly large suvs devouring our gas, soldiers murdering in our names, abortion clinics being bombed, drug addicts being thrown in jail while corporations that rape the natural world get nothing but rewards (monetary anyway... it makes one want to believe in karma). let's all worry about whether or not paris hilton needs to be writing a book and how will the new season of the simple life be, whether street smarts will win out over book smarts on the apprentice, will claire have given birth while she was missing on lost, will jack bauer get to save the world again on 24, will joey ever be as good as friends once was, and will that pig 'lil bit' predict the same weather punxsutawney phil will?

maybe bill murray can repeat next wednesday over and over and over again (again) until the wars end and the forests grow back and the real world matters more than the real world.

---

fun endnote: the spellcheck thought punxsutawney was me misspelling punctuating. that would be some seriously bad spelling, methinks

Posted by ca4/muaddib at 9:35 AM PST
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Friday, 21 January 2005
a moment of silence (or not)

so, a new revolutionary era begins, or so some cnn type commentators would have us believe. bush was downright messianic in suggested we should rid the world of tyranny... except, hasn't that supposedly been the goal of all of humanity since the birth of our modern culture that breeds those horrible tyrants? so, it's a powerful, revolutionary message, to suggest evil exists and we should go kill it?

the only amazing thing in bush's speech was that he barely bothered with the big "terrorist" word, instead going for (or against, rather) "tyranny"

the "war on terror" (a concept and not really anything against which someone can make war) is melting into something even broader and scarier. if only we could actually use the might and riches of the united states to stop the tyrannical acts across the globe (without being tyrannical about it, ourselves, of course), if we could do that fairly and broadly, unilaterally... if we could actually be the police of the world, maybe it would come to something good... well, as good as one might expect from our modern culture, anyway. except, no one can actually expect us to be able to do any of that. we will go where there is money to be made

we don't care about "terrorists" or tyrants. well, that says it wrong. the people of the united states might care about "terrorists" or tyrants--they might also care about the streets smarts vs book smarts apprentice battle, but that won't be changing the world anytime soon, will it?--but the united states as an entity unto itself does not care about those who might do us harm except to mow them over as we head into the pastures of green (money, that is), the fields of gold (oil, that is)

that being said, i would like to officially change my view on suvs at this time. i say, now, that we all get the biggest, baddest suvs we can, the h2, the excursion, the escalade, the avalanche, the behemoth (oh wait, i think i made up that last one), and we waste as much gas as we can, just guzzle and guzzle and guzzle away. let's get the world's oil supply to dwindle at an even more alarming rate. let's just burn through it all as fast as we possibly can. hell, let's start running our appliances on it. let's stop running power plants on coal and run those on oil as well. let's make it our goal to rid the world of all oil or oil related materials by, say, 2010

then, maybe we can get the fuck on with living, without the shadow of "terrorists" or the "war on terror" and someone will have to get us a damn alternative energy source already or we'll have to start thinning the herd (or rather, it will thin itself out naturally... and you thought i was suggesting some sort of genocide, didn't you?) so we can live comfortably without the expense of other lives (human lives)

or, we could keep stepping all over foreigners, killing near-indiscriminately because we want control over all the money and fuel and damn the consequences

Posted by ca4/muaddib at 12:01 AM PST
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Thursday, 20 January 2005
all hail emperor bush

8:54am pst : what the fuck is this girl singing? announcer fella (trent lott, i guess) called it the american anthem. i expected the star-spangled banner. i guess i'm at fault here

so far, there's been parading and announcing and cheney swearing in and lots of hoopla

8:56 : bush sworn in. gun salute. lovely.

supposedly his speech has been clocked at 17 minutes. that's about 16 too long for me, but i'm gonna try to watch it anyway, just cause i'm a masochist

9:02 : the first real groan, with that line about everyone in the world having equal rights cause they bear the image of the maker

9:03 : i grab the dictionary to doublecheck the definition of tyranny, since our goal is to get rid of it by force and all

9:05 : "freedom is eternally right" so why does god have rules?

9:06 : "america's belief in human dignity" like that in chomping down on bull testicles on fear factor

9:07 : i swear a soldier in the audience just rolled his eyes at the permanent tyranny/permanent slavery line

9:07 : "when you stand for your liberty, we will stand with you" or on you, if that's the way it has to be

9:08 : "rulers of outlaw regimes" - technically, bush isn't one of those anymore, is he? the lucky bastard

9:09 : "freedom's enemies" - didn't he just explain that every mind goes toward freedom? so, who are these enemies then?

9:11 : so, he's talking about the dead soldiers and it occurred to me: with all the money spent on the celebration today, could they have afforded to invite the families of the 1300 + dead soldiers to come represent their fallen family members? not that they'd want that visual a symbol of all that death, of course

9:13 : "an ownership society" - isn't that the problem? that we're all about owning everything and believing the world belongs to us?

9:15 : cool, didn't know ennoble was a word. dictionary confirmed, though, he wasn't just making up that one

9:18 : he's just rambling now, soemthing about the ebb and flow of history, the author of liberty, and something

9:19 : the liberty bell meant something when it rang?, does he really want to reference that bell as a symbol here? i mean, considering that it's been broken for years

and, he's done, and he's got that shit-eating grin going on, and i'm done for now

i'd rather let the kids watch a few cartoons than listen to anymore of this, though i'm sure i'll check in again later

ALL HAIL OUR HOLY EMPEROR BUSH (and check out that halo):


Posted by ca4/muaddib at 9:10 AM PST
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Wednesday, 19 January 2005
"keep contributing to the tsunami disaster"

that title comes from leonardo dicaprio, from sunday's golden globes. obviously, he meant that we should keep contributing to the relief effort, but poor wording is poor wording. so, i'm going to assume that dicaprio loves disaster and wants more of it--he did, afterall, star in the most successful disaster movie yet. we must assume a fetishistic connection there: leo loves disaster and death just like mel gibson loves torture (see the mad max trilogy, braveheart and, obviously, the passion of the christ)

of course, leo isn't the only one talking about the tsunami. it would seem all the celebrities, big or small, are getting involved. hell, there's already been a network telethon. but, i'd like to point out a few statements from some government folks

first, there's condi rice, the devil on bush's shoulder (not to imply that there isn't a devil on the other shoulder, as well). at her confirmation hearing tuesday, she said "the tsunami was a wonderful opportunity to show not just the us government, but the heart of the american people. and i think it has paid great dividends for us." isn't the kind of attitude we try to save for private government meetings, not the televised ones? sure, it makes us look good to be all helpful, but aren't we supposed to at least pretend we're doing it out of the goodness of our hearts and the righteousness of the action? should be openly helping people to try to repair our worldy image of late? or, should we be helping people because those people need help and we've taken it upon ourselves as the most powerful and rich nation on the planet to act like a real big brother (and not that literary referenced one), supportive and understanding?

so, let's turn to colin powell. "i hope that as a result of our efforts, as a result of our helicopter pilots being seen by the citizens of indonesia helping them, that value system of ours will be reinforced," he said. he might have a point if, say, we'd postponed killing muslims at the same time we went off to save some from the destruction? but, as long as we continue shooting and exploding the so-called insurgents and terrorists in iraq, not to mention the numerous innocent bystanders, can we really try to win favor with the world by helping some other folks a few thousand miles farther east? isn't all just so obviously a PR campaign if we are so selective about it? if we really cared to help people, wouldn't we be helping the innocents in iraq as well? hell, wouldn't we have offered $350 million on the first chance, rather than the $15 million and $35 million we offered instead to the tsunami relief efforts?

if you're kicking a guy while he's down, is it really much of a gesture if you help his brother up at the same time?

and, if we think the world is so bad off, the starving, the poor, all those third world folks we try not to see on those commercials that plead for donations, just pennies a day and all that jazz, shouldn't we have already been donating money to help them, even before nature threw out a big fuck you to tens of thousands of coastal dwellers?

what's the point in being great and powerful if everybody beneath us hates us? what's the point in being great and powerful if all the lowly peons and plebes are going to die from before we can exploit them to make us some nikes?

Posted by ca4/muaddib at 9:33 AM PST
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Tuesday, 18 January 2005
it's not real until we see it on tv
Now Playing: green day - american idiot

a little caffeine and chocolate and some medicine and i think i'm up for a blog entry, in theory. that is, i'm not feeling too great today, but after an extended weekend, i really want to be productive today anyway

thing is, just like last january, oddly enough, the world is boring. war goes on, no significant changes, no chance of a real ending anytime soon. bush gets reinnaugurated this week, and despite the talk of how way too much money is being spent on the celebration and the protestors look to suck, i'm not sure i fell like being bothered by any of it. no one is about to do anything drastic or even entertaining. it is in our cultural makeup that we will sit idly by and let the government do whatever it wants, an odd cultural twist considering this nation was built on the backs of revolutionaries and folks running from religious persecution...

we white folks need to take a cue from the blacks or the jews. if once we were persecuted, we should keep playing the victim and live our lives as if those in power are the enemy... except, the ones who were peresecuted before are now in power and the slaves and concentration camp folks still aren't getting much of it (the power, i mean)

but, it is in our cultural makeup to play ourselves as victims, isn't it, even as we contend that we are on top of the world, omnipotent and arrogant and american. we're the greatest country on the planet. but, terrorists want us dead so let's all cower...

*sigh*

not like i don't jump on that bandwagon each time i sit down to write something here. oh, woe is me, poor persecuted middle class white guy with every opportunity in the world. i got to go to a great college, so i dropped out. i had a great office job thing going, with opportunity to take on more responsibility and more hours and make a career (if you will) of it, but i quit and went back to some temp work and then nothing, trading the selling of my time for a happier existence with my wife and kids

except the world went on as it had before, indifferent to whether or not my life was better when i wasn't selling it hour by hour, doing work that served no obvious purpose. the world went on before, no matter how much i made a go at being a writer (whether in novel form, comic form or here in these political/social/cultural essays/blog entries). the war on terror followed closely on network television's war on originality and hollywood's war on depth and all that seems to be coming of any of it (the wars and rumors of wars, that is) is more of the same, one child of mother culture ruling the rest at the expense of a soul (not that i believe in that sort of thing)

i can be happy in this place, this apartment, with my kids and my wife and my books and my cds and my movies and tv and drawings and writings and i can separate my life from the world... but, what happens when the world decides i'm too loud (too outspoken, anyway)? or will it even hear me? it's not like my blog had a huge audience. it's not like my revolution is coming and everyone is just dying to get in line beside and behind me. we don't want a revolution. we just want more of the same, our country getting richer as the world gets poorer, our entertainment getting shallower as the shark infested waters of the third world get deeper, explosions on the evening news and in our saturday morning cartoons, the destruction of the world just another commodity to be bought and sold and watched between espisodes of the apprentice and without a trace and trading spouses, trading spaces, law & order and csi and... we can turn to the matrix or lost for philosophical commentary. we don't have to think about the real world as long as we can boil it down into hour long fictional blocks or even just edited down segments for reality television

there is no reality anymore. that's the way of it. as long as we can make a show about it, it isn't real enough for it to really take up our time. as long as we can put embedded reporters into the thick of things and the digital footage looks hardly more real than the latest first person shooter, why should any of us take any of it seriously? why should we care except if it doesn't bother to entertain us? then, we can change the channel to something that will and maybe send a letter to the fcc

Posted by ca4/muaddib at 11:35 AM PST
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Thursday, 13 January 2005
the nazi prince, lost's garden and the fossil record

england's prince harry went as a nazi to a costume party and everybody's outraged. the simon wiesenthal center urged him to visit auschwitz, tony blair's office tried to stay out of it even as a spokesman said "clearly and error was made" and harry already apologized, saying it was a poor choice of costume

now, had he dressed up as the devil himself, would anyone have complained? or would all the little english girls already in love with him be clamoring for photos of the devilish bad boy?

dressing up in a costume does not mean one supports whatever that costume may be. you dress as spider-man, that doesn't mean you were bitten by a radioactive spider. you dress as a vampire, that doesn't mean you drink blood or support the drinking of blood. you dress as a witch, it doesn't mean you cast spells. you dress as a ballerina, that doesn't mean you even have any coordination, let alone great dancing skill. and, dressing as superman does not mean you can fly

and, dressing up as a nazi for a fucking costume party does not mean you support killing joys or invading poland or even enjoy german food. and, it is not in poor taste to wear a costume that offends someone

***

in personal news, i was a little proud of myself during lost last night. see, i've read books by the likes of daniel quinn (ishmael, my ishmael, the story of b, etc.) and i generally subscribe to the negative view as to what the agricultural revolution has done to humanity, the makeshift prison in which it has confined our culture. so, on lost last night, even after they've pointed out that there is fruit all over the place and their diets are lacking in, if anything, protein, they reveal that sun has started a garden, and yay for them, it's presented like a great idea, a wonderful solution, nevermind that there still would be a lack of protein if not for the few fish jin has been catching, as locke has not been getting any boar of late. thing is, in this very episode, it was pointed out how easily and readily available fruit was, that it was all over the damn place. 48 (less now) survivors on a tropical island, and they need a fucking garden? the plants are already growing. the fruit is already there. you don't need to line it all up and mass grow it. figure their mystery island to have a big population explosion once these folks get over the trauma of their crash and get horny

what made me proud there, you ask. well, i was proud that my dislike of their garden idea (a la the big failure of the main character in the mosquito coast), their insistence on forcing the island to fit their civilized ideals, came so naturally. i didn't have to think of it later. as soon as i saw their garden, i was annoyed, wishing that with all the veiled (and not so veiled) reference to philosophy and human nature (as animal or not) that the writers would be smart enough to have someone (even if it had to be creepy ol locke) suggest they didn't need a damn garden

maybe that invisible monster is mother culture's little sister, and the garden will be the last straw that gets her to start slaughtering these pesky little fleas that crashed onto her island

***

and, i'm tired of people pointing out the incomplete fossil record as the perfect refutation of the theory of evolution. so we haven't recovered the remains of every animal that ever lived. big fucking deal. have these theists never heard of decay or decomposition? what we have found, however much you might think it looks like it comes in bursts of change, is plenty enough to refute creation, certainly. even if you take the genesis account of creation as man's metaphor for what god did, doesn't taking millions of years to create all the various forms of life (not to mention, letting all the dinosaurs die, not a very good job on the part of an omnipotent creator) kinda make god look a little pathetic and powerless?

or are we to jump to the intelligent design theory: god created stuff then sat back. hell, let's go with the theory that there was a big bang but god started it and hasn't done a thing since. thing is, then, what point is there in worshipping said god? what point is there in even acknowledging him? if he is such a hands off god, then he has placed the universe in the hands of the scientists not the religious folks. or was he only hands off accept for when he talked to noah and moses and david and all those other bibilical folks? if we side with the religious people, we have to accept a hands on god, and that does not fit with dinosaurs or everyday evolution

and, that just won't do

Posted by ca4/muaddib at 9:59 AM PST
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Wednesday, 12 January 2005
my ineptitude
Now Playing: a perfect circle - mer de nom

i'm behind schedule. i should have had this entry written already. i should have been a published author by now. i should have done something revolutionary by now. but, what are schedules to we pathetic, atheist outcasts, we few, we sad few who can't be bothered to live our lives like the rest of you, cheering on wars and lamenting one group of dead strangers rather than all of them

of course, that's just another excuse in a whole line of them i've got. it's what i do

i dropped out of college not because i couldn't take it anymore but because a paperwork mix up screwed me out of my grants and i couldn't afford to keep going, not because i realized then how completely unnecessary to my life to come college would be but because of things beyond my control

i lived for years socially alone, off to see movies all the time on my own, hiding in books (written and read) and television, no friends to speak of, not because i was socially inept but because i didn't need them, because all that jazz about how humans need companionship was a bunch of bullshit...

that's got to be it, right?

i've got a wife now, three kids, no more excuses in theory. but, i've ingrained my own supposed ineptitude in my head so far down, it's hard to let go. i throw in an excessive amount of movie rentals and a new interest in and knack for cooking and complicate things further. i try my hand at a daily comic, twice, and that goes nowhere (though there were some great strips among the many examples). i run this here blog, to an audience i could probably count on one hand, and i linger on message boards and waste time online, putting off my real writing time each day (even as i look forward to it, oddly enough), and i wonder why i don't have time for more exercise than i can manage to squeeze in, why i don't have more time to coach my son in some basic knowledge and reading skills, why i have no time at all to get any of my old manuscripts reedited and submitted to agents or publishers of late

it's all the same old tired excuse. multitask enough and, on some level, it doesn't even matter if any of the tasks are ever complete. do some of the tasks really well and the rest are diminished in importance, seemingly

and, i didn't even mention obsessing over the world's politics

Posted by ca4/muaddib at 10:31 AM PST
Post Comment | View Comments (1) | Permalink | Share This Post
Tuesday, 11 January 2005
isn't it still the season?

'tis the season is over. christmas and going into debt to get material goods for toys because we can't be bothered to show our love in more meaningful ways is over. some christmas lights remain. some trees are still up. some people are still insisting on caring about others (when they should be back to their usual selves already) just cause a bunch of folks died on the other side of the world (how many of those who are all concerned and donating money could even point out on a map the location of sri lanka two weeks ago?)

it seems like such a nice thing to want to help, though, doesn't it? it'd be a nice thing if the world had a good disaster relief organization like we have in this country, right? it's not arrogance that brings us the rescue of everybody else, is it? and, if it is, is that so wrong? if we could rescue everyone, save everyone from evil dictators or indifferent weather, if we could unilaterally bail out everybody, that would certainly be a good. but, it seems a little odd we stand so much against the redistribution of wealth and we don't want to give handouts to those in need right here at home, but a little weather (or, technically, i guess a tsunami isn't weather, since it's caused by an earthquake and not a storm) affects people who could have prepared for it in the first place (and who our own early warning system could have warned, if we were really so concerned for their well being) and we jump right in. a leader we helped put into power takes the power his people allowed him over many years to have and suddenly he's an evil we need to jump in and destroy, nevermind that we've got our own problems (and our own leader taking liberties with removing ours)

it's a strange dichotomy, our socially accepted indifference to the suffering around the world and our ability to completely bypass that indifference for grand gestures of caring... occasionally, and as long as the local news can show us local citizens who narrowly escaped, and show us women holding dead children and families broken, homes destroyed... except, how long will it be before we stop caring again, before we all forget where sri lanka is?

thing is, why do i bother complaining when people bother to do something that, arguably, is a good thing?

maybe i'm just so in love with being contrary, i can't help it. maybe i'm just sick of hypocrites and arrogant fools who think it's their place to save the world, but only when it's convenient or the news is depressing them. maybe we should stop reporting innocuous stories about celebrities and cover all the deaths around the world, the genocides, the disasters, not just the big ones, not just the ones with convenient access to oil, but every tragedy, every life lost, and see how long we can take it before we all implode

***

that being said, i meant to do another list entry today, but the list is so long it would be another week long, multiple entry number, and i don't care to do that again, so i'll just give the list (sans commentary), my 103 rentals* from blockbuster video in the last 122 (if my count is correct) days:

  1. 0911 . candyman
  2. 0911 . the game
  3. 0913 . the station agent
  4. 0915 . tremors 4 the legend begins
  5. 0915 . the shape of things
  6. 0916 . ringu
  7. 0917 . run lola run
  8. 0918 . the awful truth season two disk one
  9. 0918 . cabin fever
  10. 0919 . wrong turn
  11. 0921 . the eye
  12. 0921 . the awful truth season two disk two
  13. 0923 . mean girls
  14. 0923 . jeepers creepers 2
  15. 0924 . the bourne identity
  16. 0924 . man on fire
  17. 0925 . fearless
  18. 0927 . the last samurai
  19. 0927 . the shipping news
  20. 0928 . rebel without a cause
  21. 0928 . crouching tiger, hidden dragon
  22. 1001 . outfoxed rupert murdoch?s war on journalism
  23. 1001 . the deep end
  24. 1002 . the weather underground
  25. 1002 . dirty pretty things
  26. 1005 . ladykillers
  27. 1005 . super size me
  28. 1009 . casa de los babys
  29. 1009 . young adam
  30. 1011 . gattaca
  31. 1011 . darkness falls
  32. 1015 . fahrenhype 9/11
  33. 1015 . fahrenheit 9/11
  34. 1017 . the punisher
  35. 1017 . master and commander the far side of the world
  36. 1019 . the day after tomorrow
  37. 1019 . the lost skeleton of cadavra
  38. 1021 . tomie
  39. 1021 . the office the complete first series
  40. 1022 . following
  41. 1023 . arrested development season one disk one
  42. 1023 . the game
  43. 1025 . south park the passion of the jew
  44. 1025 . south park bigger, longer & uncut
  45. 1027 . ratcatcher
  46. 1028 . arrested development season one disk two
  47. 1028 . dawn of the dead
  48. 1030 . touching the void
  49. 1102 . galaxy quest
  50. 1104 . house of sand and fog
  51. 1106 . arrested development season one disk three
  52. 1106 . last house on the left
  53. 1111 . the stone reader
  54. 1111 . the thing
  55. 1113 . the hunting of the president
  56. 1119 . the chronicles of riddick
  57. 1119 . bush?s brain
  58. 1120 . i?m not scared
  59. 1120 . sliding doors
  60. 1122 . a day without a mexican
  61. 1123 . control room
  62. 1123 . joseph campbell and the power of myth
  63. 1127 . dirty pretty things
  64. 1129 . the saddest music in the world
  65. 1129 . uncovered the war on iraq
  66. 1202 . the da vinci code decoded
  67. 1202 . spider-man 2
  68. 1204 . the terminal
  69. 1204 . the dreamers
  70. 1206 . the pink panther
  71. 1206 . audition
  72. 1209 . existenz
  73. 1209 . the bourne supremacy
  74. 1210 . cracking the da vinci code
  75. 1211 . love object
  76. 1213 . dodgeball a true underdog story
  77. 1213 . deadline
  78. 1214 . collateral
  79. 1214 . unlocking da vinci?s code
  80. 1215 . the door in the floor
  81. 1215 . zatoichi
  82. 1217 . blood work
  83. 1221 . napoleon dynamite
  84. 1221 . shaun of the dead
  85. 1222 . corn
  86. 1222 . we don?t live here anymore
  87. 1223 . shrek 2
  88. 1225 . the exorcist
  89. 1226 . cube 2 hypercube
  90. 1228 . anchorman the legend of ron burgundy
  91. 1228 . garden state
  92. 1228 . pitch black
  93. 1230 . ghost in the shell
  94. 1230 . dogma
  95. 1231 . elf
  96. 1231 . ghost in the shell 2 innocence
  97. 0103 . king arthur
  98. 0103 . grand theft parsons
  99. 0105 . buckaroo bonsai
  100. 0107 . the alamo
  101. 0107 . dark city
  102. 0110 . hero
  103. 0110 . zoolander
* important to note, of course, i have the rental pass, a monthly charge for two movies at a time, for as long as i like (though i try to get my movies back as fast as i can, obviously)

Posted by ca4/muaddib at 10:12 AM PST
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
addendum: the benefit of the dna record

so, yesterday, i began my entry with this: "you know, there is one real benefit from the national id card...that even its supporters are ignoring"

thing is, i never got around to mentioning what that benefit was, so i figured i'd add an addendum now. dna on record with the government will help identify the bodies when the "terrorists" come after our homeland again

sounds kinda anticlimactic now. oh well

Posted by ca4/muaddib at 8:52 AM PST
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post

Newer | Latest | Older