« | April 2005 | » | ||||
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
1 | 2 | |||||
3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
and, it seems like everyone's getting healthier these days. hell, even i got up early this morning to run two miles. and, the pope... did you hear about the pope's diet plan? he's not eating any more solid foods, and he's not drinking, and apparently, he's being put into some box to control his overeating. yes, you heard it here first. the pope wasn't always sitting and mumbling cause he was old. he just was too fat to get up and had a bunch of M&Ms in his mouth. but, the cardinals have put a stop to all that, even going so far as to parade him rather embarrassingly before millions of his followers and the aforementioned putting him into a box to curb his eating...
and breathing, too, but that's hardly on point now is it?
so, here's the thing: some imax theaters in the south (that is, in those scattered few actual cities have found it in them to grow up amidst all that backwoods, hick inbreeding and slavetrading) have taken it upon themselves to show films that included references to actual science
i know, that's crazy. how dare any institution dare to 1) suggest science has any place in the south or 2) reference any word with more than, say, six letters*
and, how could a film about volcanoes (cause that's the case in point that's gotten itself banned of late**) think that southern audiences in for some firey brimstone and death and destruction at the hands of mother nature (or god, rather) would care for anything remotely educational. we wouldn't want to offend anyone's worldview with facts
"many people here believe in creationism, not evolution," says the director of an imax theater in charleston. "we've got to pick a film that's going to sell in our area." and, so, she didn't take the film... which makes me wonder if the passion recut is getting an imax-size viewing this easter weekend
and, that brings up another point (since i will be out of town and can't get a separate blog entry on easter this week): why the fuck are people still bothering with all that easter crap and getting offended by evolution anyway? are they really all that shortsighted and pathetic that they have to believe in some greater power that is going to save them all from their sinning ways, the smoking and the boozing and the casual whoring around? can't we maybe get folks to accept responsibility for their own existence and not wait on christ to show up and save us from the offenses of the world, or for the government to step in and save us from evil husbands intent on seeing us starve to death, evil dictators intent on being unlikable and holding onto nuclear weapons it wouldn't make any sense to use anyway, for papa bush to protect us all from dwindling social security and the horror that is islam?
how about we sit down all the silly people that would be offended by a reference to evolution in a fucking science film and force them to take a biology class, to learn something about genetics and natural selection... and don't let them get all offended with the "i ain't come from no monkey" shit, and teach them what evolution actually is for a change (maybe point out that if basic evolution weren't happening (with the lord almighty behind it or not) all of them redneck bastards would be identical and wouldn't be able to tell one trailer dwelling piece of ass from another... not that they'd care, cause one of em gets pregnant, they could always just say some other redneck did it, cause who could tell differently?
now, if anyone's been offended by anything i've just said, well, go smoke yourself another pack of cigarettes, get yourself drunk and try not to run over that dog in your driveway or those kids of yours playing in the street and convince yourself that this particular liberal elite prick will get what's coming to him... cause, i sure will, won't i, when armageddon passes and judgement day arrives?
* count em, evolution has a shocking nine letters, not to mention more syllables than most southerners could even count, let alone pronounce or understand
** "volcanoes of the deep sea" makes a connection between human dna and microbes inside undersea volcanoes
so, everybody's weighing in on terri schiavo. president bush rushed to washington from his vacation to sign a bill that would put terri's case under federal scrutiny, to "error on the side of life" by forcing her to be kept alive, cause one citizen's right to not be a vegetable is the business of the commander in chief these days
see, no one is allowed to die by their own choice. that is just wrong. and, nevermind the sanctity of terri's marriage and her spouse's legal right to have a say in his wife's treatment. a person can't be married to a vegetable any more than he can be married to someone of his own gender
at this point, there is one clear way to get things on their way. and, here's teddy dunn to present it:
of course, there is one person who has yet to weigh in on all this. she was young when all this began and had never bothered to set down in writing a living will, but, today we have an exclusive here, terri schiavo voicing her side of the issue in her own words:
"kubg ksh looils shugkhush maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"
wow, such eloquence
a couple entries back i spoke about a kid arrested for writing a story about zombies attacking his school. thing is, it has since been reported that there were no zombies in his stories and he had contacted some fellow students about creating some sort of military-like organization, and possibly actually getting a school shooting deal going. so, maybe this kid was actually planning... something. or maybe all that was still just harmless fun. of course, to think about a crime is the same as committing that crime, these days. hell, you don't even have to have thought about the crime of which you're accused. you could just be committing some other crime (or even just committing something that is a sin) like adultery
yeah, that's my transition to scott peterson, sentenced to death yesterday. see how advanced we are as a society. we kill people over circumstantial evidence just cause they don't happen to be the most upstanding members of society. and, not only that, we make them pay for their victims' (actually, i guess that should be victim's, as i discount that whole conner-inclusive crap) funerals. yes, along with his death sentence, peterson has been ordered to pay $10,000 restitution for funeral expenses, plus $5,000 for some unexplained reason
and the united states house of representatives passed legislation yesterday to delay the removal of terri schiavo's feeding tube in florida
the house also voted 388 to 43 to approve $81.4 billion more for our wars in iraq and afghanistan
in the michael jackson case, prosecutors seem to think pronography involving adults is useful to pedophiles
a bomb exploded in kandahar, killing at least 5 and wounding 32
and deforestationa, pollution and overpopulation continue
but the passion recut is in theaters, so all is well
now, you know what annoyed me yesterday?
hayley's 9, in 4th grade, and yesterday someone from glendale college came to her class to talk about college. also, this week they've got a field trip to ucla (hayley won't be going, but not cause i think it's a stupid indoctrination thing to get kids thinking about college far too early, rather because of a scheduling conflict). and, for yesterday's "college day", they were allowed to wear sweatshirts from their favorite colleges...
let's go over that last bit again. fourth grade students, kids ages 9 and 10, are supposed to have favorite colleges? these kids are at best 9 years from college (barring early escape from lesser school) and we want them not only thinking about college but thinking about it so specifically to have a fucking favorite? i still wonder if hayley should be making and receiving the amount of phone calls she does, and now she's supposed to be planning for college? they really want to break a kid's spirit, don't they?
i mean, we wouldn't want kids to act like kids. and we certainly wouldn't want anyone to wait until, i don't know, after fucking puberty to make big decisions about the direction of her life, for god's sake. children MUST choose a career by age 10 or they will never be successful. that is certain, no?
they must enter preschool early, get into a good kindergarten, and, a la doogie howser, have the option of testing out of elementary and going straight to university... except that last part would be wrong, of course, since half the purpose of so many years of schooling is simply to delay entrance into the larger scope of things, the work force, for if we had too many people entering the work force at the same time, everything would fall apart... except that doesn't make much sense. inevitably, all those kids WILL join the work force (well, except for the ones who choose homelessness or what have you). staggering the entrances does not change the number of them. adding years and years onto the indoctrination (a la grad school and masters programs) does not change the numbers. it just makes everyone too damn busy to notice they are being taught things they will probably never need to know (and not in that high schooler's assumption way that even basic math is never gonna be useful, cause that's just rebellious, pubescent stupidity talking), and they are being dragged through so many tests and lectures that by the time they get out and get into the rat race of the working world, they're practically thankful, so much so that they forget that they've just escaped one prison only to be confined in a new one, just cogs in a machine (to mix metaphors), bricks in the wall, nails in the coffin of our culture and our world
fuck it. better to keep all the kids in line by confining them indefinitely to school than to have them thinking they could actually affect the world in any meaningful way. we qwouldn't want that, now, would we?
in other news, lars von trier said he'll cut the scene involving a donkey being killed from manderlay, his follow-up to dogville cause some folks complained**. nevermind that the meat went for food after. he went ahead and cut it because the political and social content of the film was too important to lose over the donkey bit. as limited an audience as the film's going to get anyway, i'd say keep it in, but i also supported that girl making art out of pieces of euthanized animals a few months back, so... i'm not exactly the average person, am i... of course, i am in the audience for von trier's trilogy about the us (of which manderlay is the second film)
now if that donkey had been killed in a high school in kentucky, he'd have a real problem on his hands
* cause, apparently, "anytime you make any threat or possess matter involving a school or function, it?s a felony in the state of kentucky"
** more than 300 letters from groups and individuals in the us (of course, cause we're all about the strongly-worded letter these days), germany, britain and denmark about the scene, filmed in sweden
of course, no one but my wife will probably be reading today's entry anyway
by the way, i finally looked up terrific and it certainly does have a negative meaning despite it's colloquial use
that is all
or it should be
a contestant on the contender killed himself... or rather a guy who had already been eliminated (apparently, as just yesterday on the radio mark burnett said they had ten of the 16 episodes done and news reports of this guy's suicide said his part was done) killed himself. don't know if it ties together, maybe depression from putting his all into a goal he didn't achieve leading to shooting himself, or if it was unrelated (which seems unlikely). burnett says they won't make any special edits for the dead guy (though i'm sure there will be some on screen dedication or mention of the suicide). so, the next step is getting someone to die on camera, then we can get series 7 or the long walk or the running man going and accept that we're not trying to replace the british empire so much as the roman one, what with the gladiator battles and all the spectacle and violent pomp and circumstance. no matter how real the special effects are nowadays, we still always know that the death isn't real and the explosions were done with safety experts all over the place. and, that's just quite real enough, is it? besides, the real thing will be cheaper
and, since i'm talking to just my wife, are you getting off work early today or what?
i've got to remember not to go crazy and start shooting people. inevitably, people will find my stash of columbine stuff (not unlike that guy who shot up that mall in new york yesterday) and think i was obsessed. to be fair, i was obsessed with columbine when it happened. and i've still got newspapers and videotapes (of 24 news coverage, including funerals) that i kept to use for a book (about media coverage around a school shooting (a fictional one, that is), a book i'll probably never write, but just in case, i have the stuff in a box still). and, my website at www.angelfire.com/ca4/muaddib began with an essay of sorts drawing connections between the shooting at columbine and what was going on in kosovo at the time (a connection michael moore briefly mentioned in bowling for columbine). of course, if i started shooting people now, it'd have little or nothing to do with columbine or my stash of columbine related stuff anymore than it would have to do with my collection of first edition stephen king hardcovers or my comic book collection or my stash of cookbooks or all the various television series i've gotten on video in the dozen or so years i've been actively recording stuff (lately, i've been trying to cut down, now that most any series that has any success at all will make it onto dvd... of course, i've been watching cupid again and think i'll have to make my own dvd of that one in case my tapes get too old and unwatchable...
what was i talking about? oh, right. mall shooting yesterday, guy had stash of columbine memorabilia. not sure what counts as memorabilia (except maybe that cd of that "columbine" song, which i've got, i think, in my stash as well). anyway, real story with this mall shooting was that it was as big a story as it was yesterday. only saw it on cnn, so maybe they were the only news network to cover it like they did, but still, it was overkill (pun unintended but certainly accepted). live coverage from outside the mall, shots of the fbi and police standing around (and what were the fbi doing there, anyway?), and the big news is guy fired some bullets, and like one person was injured (shot in the leg apparently). no one even bothered to get killed. and, this had cnn doing live coverage with very little content. at least all the columbine coverage way back in 99 led to something, more than a dozen killed, so-called experts talking about how we raise boys these days and why kids lose it... and no one finding any conclusiong with which they can actually deal, so now there's strict policies about weapons in schools, metal detectors and no-tolerance rules about threats (which leads to stuff like i mentioned a while back on this blog, kids (and, a reminder, these were elementary school kids) getting arrested at school for drawing pictures of other kids dead
of course, an adult (mike diana, if you want to look up the case on google) was ordered a decade or so ago not to draw anymore after being convicted of obscenity--and, if i manage to find some issues of his comic book, boiled angel, will that show up as evidence, along with my stash of columbine media coverage, after i shoot people?
of, course, i should state for the record, i have no intention of shooting people. hell, aside from a little speeding from time to time, i don't intend to commit any crimes. still, i don't want a national ID or for people to think they understand my motives because of what kind of stuff i've got stashed around... unless of course they make sure to catalog all of it to get a nice, well rounded picture--not, for example, to cite my owning of a tarot deck as evidence of some occult purpose in anything i do
in other news, a guy was arranging for a suicide party for today, the loveliest of holidays, and he got arrested because the whole shindig would have involved a few women killing their kids before showing up for the party
and, mary kay letourneau and her previously underage lover are engaged to marry once she's done with her prison sentence. and, a funeral was held in huntsville for three kids starved to death by their mother
and, bush wants $82 billion more for iraq and afghanistan, a former lebanese prime minister and about nine others were killed in an explosion, three iraqi nation guard troops were killed when "insurgents" blew up a pipeline, and it's valentine's day, a time for love and peace and caring about others... or is it erotic games with random girls whose names you picked from a hat (see friday's blog entry or look up the origins for valentine's day customs)?
and, and obsession with columbine is a big deal when someone fires a gun? how about we stop pretending that recent things like columbine or pearl jam's jeremy video or the matrix can inspire people to kill, and maybe take a long hard look at our culture, where every day we kill each other and we pay billions so our troops can kill some foreigners as well
white people and capitalism in danger isn't the end of the world... thing is, is that the tragedy of it?
well, it leads to valentine's day, anyway. of course, really, all those cards and things should be on tuesday, the ides (15th) of february, if we want to go for pagan origins instead of the corrupted catholic (then greeting card) version. see, valentine (one of several saints with the name, actually, but the one to which the holiday refers) was, according to catholica online, a holy priest in rome, who, along with saint marius (or rather, the guy that would later be named saint marius, cause the saint title doesn't apply retroactively, does it?), assisted the martyrs in the persecution under claudius ii. there are probably some nifty details about executions and torture that could fit in there, but the saint index doesn't bother with much detail. anyway, he was apprehended, and sent by the emperor to the prefect of rome, to make him renounce his faith. he refused and was beaten with clubs and beheaded february 14, about the year 270
why he got a holiday--i don't know. i guess he just got lucky in dying the day before a pagan party, namely the feast of the lupercalia, on the aforementioned ides of march (the same ides that figure in the death of julius caesar (44 bc), so why don't we make it caesar day and we could all eat salad and perform shakespeare; now, that'd be a holiday worth celebrating)). the feast of the lupercalia was about the goddess februata juno, the goddess of "fever" or passion in love
and, here's how it went:
pagan priests, called luperci (from the roman word for a wolf), would run the party from the lupercal cave on the palantine hill in rome, where romulus and remus were supposed to have been sheltered by that wolf mother of theirs. two naked young priests, assisted by vestal virgins--cause, what party is complete without vestal virgins?--would sacrifice a dog (in place of the harder to catch wolf, surely) and a goat. blood from the animals was spread on the priests' foreheads and wiped off with some wool dipped in milk. then, the priests dressed in loincloths made from the skin of the goat and ran about the city, scourging women with strips of skin taken from the sacrificed goat. now, that's a party. see, the romans believed that this flogging would purify them and assure their future fertility and easy childbirth
so, then came the shit the catholics kept (or corrupted, for a time). see, girls would write their names on slips of paper (called billets) and they'd go in an urn, and boys would pick them out, and that girl would be their partner for a day of erotic games and they were apparently expected to remain a couple for a year after (until the next ides of march came or the two of them decided to get married, whichever came first)
the catholic church, in trying to turn all this into saint valentine's day, tried putting saint's names on those billets. instead of finding an erotic game partner, the kids would find a saint to emulate in life, cause you know that's what adolescents want, a saint to emulate. that system didn't catch on, so, in the 1500s or so, catholics went back to the girl's name thing, and then the greeting card folks showed up and said, what the hell, why only pick one girl's name? why not have several girls? why not, instead of that random picking-out-of-an-urn thing, let's buy cards and give them to all the girls that we fancy, and screw those expectations of yearlong couplehood. hell, screw being a couple at all. send valentines to your best friend, your teacher, your parents, that creepy uncle that looks at you funny, your grandma, your brother. it's all about love, and who couldn't use a little more love?
ok, to be fair, the greeting card folks showed up later. the trading of homemade valentines started soemtime before the 1600s, after trying that saint's-name-on-the-card thing again. commercially available cards weren't until maybe a century later, and hallmark wasn't founded until 1910. but, still, we can blame all the extra decorations and crap on the card companies, certainly. and, they keep the exclusivity out of it--funny frazz yesterday made a thing of cards that said "for my one and only" coming in boxes of a dozen. but, that's how it is now, with elementary school kids making valentines in class and every student better get one or that just wouldn't be fair...
and religious folks wonder why kids grow up thinking less and less of monogamy and celibacy